By Olayinka Ajayi
LAGOS — A High Court in Lagos has ordered a temporary halt to the ongoing coroner’s inquest into the death of Chimamanda Adichie’s 21-month-old Nkanu Nnamdi Esege, pending a judicial review of how the inquest was initiated and conducted.
At the heart of the matter is whether the coroner’s court had the legal basis to proceed with its investigation under the circumstances of the case.
One of the key issues likely to be examined during the judicial review is whether the coroner’s court properly assumed jurisdiction, particularly given that late Chimamanda’s son, Nkanu’s body, had already been cremated before the inquest process began. Questions have also been raised about the absence of a post-mortem examination, which some parties argue is an important component of establishing the cause of death in such proceedings.
Nkanu Adichie-Esege, the young son of celebrated author Chimamanda Adichie and Dr. Ivara Esege, passed away in January 2026.
His death prompted calls for an official inquiry, leading to the opening of a coroner’s inquest at the Yaba Magistrate Court in February 2026.
Since then, the proceedings have faced numerous delays and procedural disagreements.
The inquest first sat on February 25, reconvened on April 14, and briefly resumed on May 5 before being suspended pending discussions with the Lagos State Attorney-General and the legal representatives of the parties.
In granting permission for the review, the Lagos High Court noted that the application raised significant procedural and fairness issues that deserve fuller consideration.
The court also directed that all proceedings in the coroner’s court remain suspended until the substantive application is heard and determined.
The applicant has been given 14 days to file the main application, and the matter is scheduled to return to court on June 8, 2026.
For now, the coroner’s inquest remains on hold while the High Court considers whether the process followed so far meets the requirements of the law. The outcome of the judicial review could determine not only the future of this particular inquest but also provide clarity on how similar cases are handled.
